Named scopes and has_many :through relations in Rails
Named scopes in rails make for tidier code.
Instead of:
Response.find( :conditions => {:result => 'correct' } )
A named scope in the Response model looks like this:
named_scope :correct, :conditions => { :result => 'correct' }
and allows me to say:
Response.correct
Or, more usefully:
Question.last.responses.correct
This will even work with a has_many :through relationship:
class Course < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :questions
has_many :responses, :through => :questions
...
end
Course.last.responses.correct
However, in Rails 2.2.2 there is a problem with named scopes that use inequalities. This usually requires a slightly different formulation of the :conditions
like this:
named_scope :recent, :conditions => [ 'created_at > ?', Time.now - 3600 ]
Which allows me to say:
Question.last.responses.recent
But not:
Course.last.responses.recent
The first method produces:
SELECT * FROM `responses` WHERE (`responses`.question_id = 123) AND (created_at > '2009-06-13 22:21:38')
Whereas the second method produces:
SELECT `responses`.* FROM `responses` INNER JOIN questions ON responses.question_id = questions.id WHERE ((`questions`.course_id = 10)) AND (created_at > '2009-06-13 22:21:38')
Which causes the Rails log to complain:
Mysql::Error: Column 'created_at' in where clause is ambiguous
In other words, because of the way Rails translates the named_scope
into SQL, it is not clear whether that inner join is selecting on questions.created_at
or responses.created_at
.
A simple workaround is to use ranges instead of inequalities:
named_scope :recent, :conditions => {:created_at => Time.now-3600..Time.now}
Which generates slightly different, and unambiguous, SQL:
SELECT `responses`.* FROM `responses` INNER JOIN questions ON responses.question_id = questions.id WHERE ((`questions`.course_id = 10)) AND (`responses`.`created_at` BETWEEN '2009-06-13 22:33:27' AND '2009-06-13 23:33:27')
This is unlikely to be the most elegant solution to the problem, but it works, which is good enough for me—at least for now.